RESEARCH STANDARD · VERSION 01

Useful before searchable. Evidence before assertion.

This policy explains how Axiom Forge creates decision-grade material for leaders commissioning websites, applications, platforms and AI systems.

PUBLISHING PRINCIPLES

The standard behind every field note.

01
Purpose
Every article must help a real commercial, product or engineering decision. We do not publish pages solely to occupy a keyword.
02
Sources
Regulatory, government, standards-body and first-party technical sources are preferred. Secondary sources are used when they add necessary market context.
03
Originality
Axiom Forge adds its own structure, analysis and product point of view. Summaries without meaningful added value are not considered publishable research.
04
Case notes
Analyses of public companies are explicitly independent. They do not imply a client relationship, access to private data or responsibility for the company’s results.
05
Concept work
Demonstration products and visual concepts are labelled as concepts and are not represented as shipped client work.
06
Review & updates
Material claims are checked before publication. Articles carry published and modified dates and are updated when evidence, regulation or product conditions materially change.
07
Corrections
Substantive factual errors are corrected rather than silently defended. Readers can report a concern to hello@axiomforge.am.
08
Commercial independence
Insights may link to Axiom Forge services and the project brief, but the usefulness of the article must not depend on becoming a client.

ACCOUNTABILITY

Email hello@axiomforge.am with the article URL and the specific statement in question. Relevant evidence is reviewed before an update is made.

Last reviewed: 02 August 2026.